Comparison of propofol and desflurane for postoperative neurocognitive function in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective randomized trial.

Background: Following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 40-50% of survivors experience cognitive dysfunction, which affects their quality of life. Anesthetic agents play a pivotal role in aneurysm surgeries. However, substantial evidence regarding their effects on neurocognitive function is lacking. This study evaluated the effects of propofol and desflurane on postoperative neurocognitive function and serum S-100B levels. Methods: One hundred patients were equally randomized to receive either propofol (Group P) or desflurane (Group D). Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale at three different time points: Preoperatively, at the time of discharge, and one month after surgery. Perioperative serum levels of S-100B were also measured. Results: The preoperative mean cognitive score in Group P was 21.64 + 4.46 and in Group D was 21.66 + 4.07 (P = 0.79). At discharge, a significant decrease in cognitive scores was observed compared to preoperative scores (Group P- 20.91 + 3.94, P = 0.03 and Group D-19.28 + 4.22, P = 0.00); however, scores were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.09). One month following surgery, mean cognitive scores were 22.63 + 3.57 in Group P and 20.74 + 3.89 in Group D, and the difference was significant (P = 0.04). Higher memory and orientation scores were observed in Group P than in Group D at one month (P < 0.05) in the subgroup analysis. Both groups had similar serum S-100B levels. Conclusion: The mean cognitive scores one month after surgery improved significantly with propofol compared with desflurane, but without clinical significance. Individual domain analysis demonstrated that orientation and memory scores were better preserved with propofol.

Comparison of the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative analgesia and intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing spine surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Background: Opioids form the basis of perioperative pain management but are associated with multiple side effects. In opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), several non-opioid drugs or neuraxial/regional blocks are used as substitutes for opioids. Ketamine, a N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, provides intense analgesia. However, there is a shortage of literature on the effects of ketamine-based OFA on hemodynamics (HD) and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included 60 adult patients. The patients in Group OFA (n = 30) received OFA with ketamine and ketofol (1:5) infusion, and those in Group OBA (n = 30) received opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) with fentanyl and propofol infusion. The postoperative pain-free period, pain scores, rescue analgesia, intraoperative HDs, and postoperative complications were assessed. Results: The mean pain-free period in Group OFA (9.86 ± 1.43 hr) was significantly higher than that in Group OBA (6.93 ± 1.93 hr) (P = 0.002). During the postoperative 48 hours, the total requirement of fentanyl was considerably lower in Group OFA (P < 0.05). There was a significantly higher incidence of hypertension in Group OFA (46%) and hypotension (43%) in Group OBA (43%), respectively. Postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) was more common in Group OBA at the 2nd and 6th hr (P = 0.046 and P = 0.038). Conclusion: OFA with ketamine and ketofol provided adequate postoperative analgesia with a lower incidence of PONV after spine surgery. However, hypertension in the ketamine group and hypotension in the propofol group required fine titration of the infusion rate of drugs during the intraoperative period.

Suture-Based Vascular Closure Versus Surgical Closure of Large Bore Arteriotomies: A Real-World Experience.

INTRODUCTION: With the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR), and frequent use of left ventricular assist devices in complicated percutaneous coronary interventions, the use of large bore arterial access has become a necessity. In the index study, we compared the percutaneous closure of large arteriotomies with open surgical (OS) closure. METHODS: It was a prospective study in which we compared the technical success and vascular complication rate associated with the use of a suture-based vascular closure device (VCD): Perclose ProGlide (PP) with that of OS closure. The study was carried out at Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, India, from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. The inclusion criteria were any percutaneous intervention involving large bore arterial access (≥12 French (F) sheath). The exclusion criteria were any condition where a persistent need for vascular access at the end of the procedure was required. We noted the baseline characteristics and type of anesthesia for all patients. The primary outcome was technical success and major vascular complications, which included major local site bleeding: Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or more, failed hemostasis requiring a second intervention, and acute vessel occlusion. Total time taken for the procedure (TTP), time to ambulation (TTA), and time to discharge post-procedure (TTD) were noted for each patient. The secondary outcomes were any bleeding other than major, local hematoma sized >5 cm at 24 hours, pseudo aneurysm formation at 30 days, and acute limb ischemia at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (PP: 60 (males: 54, females: 6), OS: 60 (males: 50, females: 10)) were included in this study. The mean age of patients was comparable in both groups (PP: 71.8 ± 9.62 years and OS: 71.0 ± 7.76 years, p-value: 0.63). Total large arteriotomies (mean size: 18.03F ± 3.34) closed were 184 (PP: 90, OS: 94). The procedures performed were EVAR: 64 (PP: 30, OS: 34), TAVI: 38 (PP: 21, OS: 17), and TEVAR: 18 (PP: 9, OS: 9). All patients in PP group received dual ProGlide with preclose technique. All TEVAR procedures (total arteriotomies: 18) required a vascular sheath of ≥ 24F. There was no statistical difference between the mean size of sheaths used in the two groups. The technical success (PP: 95.55%, OS: 97.87%, 95% CI: -5.78%-10.98%, p-value: 0.48) and rate of major complications were similar in both groups. Three patients in the PP group who had failed hemostasis with two ProGlides were successfully managed with one additional Angioseal (6F) each. The occurrence of hematoma sized larger than 5 cm was significantly more in the PP group compared to the OS group (PP: 7 (7.78%), OS: 0 (0%), p-value: 0.006). While GA was used for all patients who underwent vascular closure with OS, only eight patients (13.33%) in the PP group required GA. The TTP, TTA, and TTD were significantly lower in the PP group as compared to the OS group. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous closure of large bore arteriotomies with suture-based VCDs is equally effective and is not associated with increased major vascular complications. In fact, the TTP, TTA, and TTD are significantly lower in the PP group which can translate to better patient comfort and lower costs.

Effect of Peri-operative Blood Transfusion on Neurological Outcome Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. Whether the physiological benefits of transfusion for anemia surpass the risk of blood transfusion remains to be determined. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to evaluate the impact of peri-operative blood transfusion on the long-term neurological outcome, assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included the impact of transfusion on the short-term neurological outcome, assessed by Modified Rankin Score at discharge/7 days, and on the incidence of vasospasm, infarction, re-exploration, tracheostomy, and length of hospital stay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted on 185 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage undergoing clipping of the aneurysmal neck. In our study, blood transfusion was administered to keep the target Hb around 10 g/dL. RESULTS: Unfavorable long-term outcome was found in 27/97 (28%) of patients who received a blood transfusion as compared to 13/74 (18%) of patients who did not receive a transfusion (P = 0.116). Patients receiving transfusion had more chances of an unfavorable outcome at discharge/7 days as compared to those not transfused [44/103 (43%) versus 22/80 (27%)], P = 0.025. There were increased chances of vasospasm, infarction, re-exploration, tracheostomy, and increased length of hospital stay in patients receiving transfusion (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of blood transfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with increased neurological complications and hence an unfavorable short-term outcome. However, when used judiciously as per the clinical requirements, blood transfusion did not have a significant effect on long-term neurological outcome.

Sexual Dysfunction after Clipping of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction significantly affects interpersonal relationships and overall quality of life. It remains a matter of concern for risk assessment and counseling in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To assess the sexual dysfunctions in patients undergoing clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms and comparative evaluation among different anterior circulation aneurysms. METHOD: We prospectively included 40 male patients of ruptured intracranial aneurysms of anterior circulation (age range: 20-60 years; sexually active preoperatively), managed with craniotomy and clipping. We evaluated the sexual outcome in patients with excellent Glasgow outcome score (GOS) five at a minimum one year of follow-up. Patients with GOS-5 status at follow-up were broadly classified into two groups: Anterior communicating artery aneurysm (Acom), and non-Acom) aneurysms. We valued sexual outcome with Subjective Sexual Arousal Scale for Men at follow-up, and compared in the two groups. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 44.78 ± 9.51 years. Besides 20 Acom aneurysms, other groups included 11 middle cerebral artery aneurysms, five internal carotid artery aneurysms, three posterior communicating artery aneurysms, and one distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm. The mean follow-up was 24.45 ± 13.58 months. Patients with non-Acom aneurysms had an overall better outcome in the sexual performance domain "P = 0.015," mental satisfaction domain "P = 0.009," and sexual assertiveness domain "P = 0.007." However, there was no statistical difference in partner communication domain "P = 0.593," and partner relationship domain "P = 0.378." Overall, the sexual outcome was inferior in patients treated for Acom aneurysms compared to other anterior circulation aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, sexual dysfunctions are common even after good clinical outcomes. The study revealed prominent differences in outcomes on the sexual quality of life in patients harboring Acom aneurysms as compared to anterior circulation aneurysms located off-midline.

Nitrous oxide splurge in a tertiary health care center and its environmental impact: No more laughing stock.

Background: Nitrous oxide has been an integral part of surgical anesthesia for many years in the developed world and is still used in developing countries such as India. The other main concerns in low-resource countries are the lack of an advanced anesthesia gas-scavenging system and modular surgical theatres. As a greenhouse gas that has been present in the atmosphere for more than 100 years and damages the ozone layer, nitrous oxide is three times worse than sevoflurane. Here, we conducted an observational study to quantify the annual nitrous oxide consumption and its environmental impact in terms of carbon dioxide equivalence in one of busiest tertiary health care and research centers in Northern India. Methods: Data related to nitrous oxide expenditure' from the operation theatre and manifold complex of our tertiary care hospital and research center from 2018 to 2021 were collected monthly and analyzed. The outcomes were extracted from our observational study, which was approved by our institutional ethics board (INT/IEC/2017/1372 Dated 25.11.2017) and registered prospectively under the Central Registry (CTRI/2018/07/014745 Dated 05.07.2018). Results: The annual nitrous oxide consumption in our tertiary care hospital was 22,081.00, 22,904.00, 17,456.00, and 18,392.00 m3 (cubic meters) in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. This indicates that the environmental impact of nitrous oxide (in terms of CO2 equivalents) from our hospital in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 was 13,016.64, 13,287.82, 10,289.94, and 10,841.24 tons, respectively. Conclusion: This huge amount of nitrous oxide splurge is no longer a matter of laughter, and serious efforts should be made at every central and peripheral health center level to reduce it.

Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are used for analgesia in acute pancreatitis (AP), the analgesic of choice is not known. We compared buprenorphine, an opioid, and diclofenac, an NSAID, for analgesia in AP. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, AP patients were randomized to receive intravenous diclofenac or intravenous buprenorphine. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesia, delivered through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Primary outcome was the difference in the dose of rescue fentanyl required. Secondary outcomes were the number of effective and ineffective demands of rescue fentanyl, pain-free interval, reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, adverse events, and organ failure development. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were randomized to diclofenac and 24 to buprenorphine. The 2 groups were matched at baseline. The total amount of rescue fentanyl required was significantly lower in the buprenorphine group:130 µg, interquartile range (IQR), 80-255 vs 520 µg, IQR, 380-1065 (P < .001). The number of total demands was 32 (IQR, 21-69) in the diclofenac arm vs 8 (IQR, 4-15) in the buprenorphine arm (P < .001). The buprenorphine group had more prolonged pain-free interval (20 vs 4 hours; P < .001), with greater reduction in the VAS score at 24, 48, and 72 hours compared with the diclofenac group. These findings were confirmed in the subgroup of moderately severe/severe pancreatitis. Adverse events profile was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with diclofenac, buprenorphine appears to be more effective and equally safe for pain management in AP patients, even in the subcohort of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (Trial Registration number: CTRI/2020/07/026914).

Comparison of the efficacy of intranasal atomised dexmedetomidine versus intranasal atomised ketamine as a premedication for sedation and anxiolysis in children undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety leads to adverse clinical outcomes and long-term maladaptive behavioural changes. The role of intranasal atomised dexmedetomidine and atomised ketamine as premedication to produce sedation and anxiolysis in paediatric neurosurgical patients has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of intranasal atomised dexmedetomidine and intranasal atomised ketamine as premedication in producing sedation and facilitating smooth induction in children undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery. DESIGN: A prospective randomised double-blind trial. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-four children aged 1 to 10 years undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery. METHODS: Children were randomised to receive intranasal atomised dexmedetomidine 2.5 µg kg -1 (Group D, n  = 32) and intranasal atomised ketamine 5 mg kg -1 (Group K, n  = 32) 30 min before surgery. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome was to compare the level of sedation in both groups using the University of Michigan Sedation Score (UMSS). The secondary outcomes included an assessment of the ease of parental separation, intravenous cannulation and satisfactory mask acceptance along with perioperative vitals (heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation). The incidence of emergence agitation and time to discharge were also noted. RESULTS: The degree of sedation was significantly better in Group D as compared to Group K at 20 min (UMSS, 1.55 ±â€Š0.51 versus 1.13 ±â€Š0.34, difference, -0.406; 95% CI, -0.621 to -0.191; P  = 0.0001) and 30 min (2.32 ±â€Š0.6 versus 1.94 ±â€Š0.50, difference, -0.374; 95% CI, -0.650 to -0.100; P  = 0.007). The ease of parental separation, venous cannulation and mask acceptance ( P  = 0.83, 0.418 and 0.100 respectively) were comparable in both groups. The heart rate was lower in group D at 10, 20 and 30 min post-drug administration but was clinically insignificant. The incidence of emergence agitation and time to discharge was also similar with no adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: Intranasal atomised dexmedetomidine produces greater sedation as compared to intranasal atomised ketamine with comparable ease of parental separation, venous cannulation and mask acceptance with no adverse effects.

Comparison of APACHE II and APACHE IV score as predictors of mortality in patients with septic shock in intensive care unit: A prospective observational study.

Background and Aims: Prediction of outcome in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is of imperative importance. Our aim was to assess and compare the performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and APACHE IV scores in predicting mortality in adult patients suffering from septic shock admitted to our ICU. Material and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a 14-bedded medical ICU of a tertiary care center from January 2019 to March 2020; 128 patients suffering from septic shock were included and APACHE II and IV scores were calculated. We also calculated the predicted and actual mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios. The receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess discrimination. Results: Out of the 128 patients, 63 patients (49.21%) died. The mean (± standard deviation) admission APACHE II score was 16.7 ± 5.53, while the mean APACHE IV score was 67.25 ± 25.99. The non-survivors had significantly higher APACHE II and IV scores when compared to those who survived (P < 0.001). APACHE II had a slightly better discriminative power (with the area under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.78) than APACHE IV (with the area under the ROC curve of 0.74). The mean predicted mortality rate (PMR) of the patient population calculated on the basis of the APACHE II scoring system was 22.46 ± 15.76, and the mean PMR calculated as per the APACHE IV scoring system was 11.64 ± 15.59. Conclusion: Both APACHE II and APACHE IV underestimated mortality in septic shock patients. Both APACHE II and APACHE IV were comparable in differentiating survivors from non-survivors. However, there was a good correlation between the two models.

Impact of Tailored-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Conventional Care in Patients of Gastro-Duodenal Perforation: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program established improved clinical outcomes in elective surgery; however, its role in emergencies is uncertain. This study was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a tailored-ERAS (t-ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing modified Graham's patch closure for gastro-duodenal perforation. METHODS: A single-centre, prospective, parallel-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted from February 2021 to December 2021. Patients with gastroduodenal perforation undergoing modified Graham's patch were randomly assigned to either conventional care or the t-ERAS pathway. Patients with refractory septic shock, psychiatric or neurological disorders, pregnancy, multiple perforations, sealed-off perforations, and perforation sizes greater than 1.5 cm were excluded. The primary outcome was to compare the length of hospitalization (LOH). Functional recovery parameters and morbidity were compared in secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients each were included in conventional care and the t-ERAS group. In the t-ERAS group, LOH was significantly shorter (6.3 SD2.15 days versus 9.56 SD4.33 days, p = 0.001). Patients in the t-ERAS group had significantly early functional recovery (days) with time to first bowel sound (1.8 SD0.41; p 0.002), first flatus (2.52 SD0.65; p = 0.026), first stool (3.04 SD0.68; p < 0.001), first liquid diet (2.24 SD0.60; p = 0.002), and duration of ileus (2.64 SD0.86; p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in morbidity such as post-operative nausea and vomiting, SSI, or pulmonary complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Tailored ERAS pathways are safe and effective in reducing the LOH and promoting early functional recovery in patients undergoing emergency closure of gastro-duodenal perforation.

Assessment of impaired cerebral autoregulation and its correlation with neurological outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective and observational study.

Background: Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is crucial for the maintenance of cerebral homeostasis. It can be assessed by measuring transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) using transcranial Doppler (TCD). We aimed at assessing the incidence of impaired CA (ICA) and its correlation with the neurological outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with aSAH scheduled for aneurysmal clipping were enrolled in this prospective and observational study. Preoperative and consecutive 5-day postoperative THRR measurements were taken. Primary objective of the study was to detect the incidence of ICA and its correlation with vasospasm (VS) postclipping, and neurological outcome at discharge and 1, 3, and 12 months was secondary objectives. Results: ICA (THRR < 1.09) was observed in 69 patients preoperatively, 74 patients on the 1st and 2nd postoperative day, 76 patients on 3rd postoperative day, and 78 patients on 4th and 5th postoperative day. Significant VS was seen in 13.4% and 61.5% of patients with intact THRR and deranged THRR, respectively (P < 0.000). Out of 78 patients who had ICA, 42 patients (53.8%) at discharge, 60 patients (76.9%) at 1 month, 54 patients (69.2%) at 3 month, and 55 patients (70.5%) at 12 months had unfavorable neurological outcome significantly more than those with preserved CA. Conclusion: Incidence of ICA assessed in aSAH patients varies from 69% to 78% in the perioperative period. The deranged CA was associated with significantly poor neurological outcome. Therefore, CA assessment using TCD-based THRR provides a simple, noninvasive bedside approach for predicting neurological outcome in aSAH.

Comparison of Intraoperative Low-Dose Ketodex and Fentanyl Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia In Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized double-blind study. PURPOSE: To assess the analgesic effects of the combination of a low-dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine (ketodex) infusion and compare it with that of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after spine surgeries. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Adequate pain management following spine surgeries is crucial. Approximately 57% of patients experience inadequate pain control in the first 24 hours following elective spine surgery, which is attributable to the extensive soft tissue and muscle damage. METHODS: The study included 60 patients graded American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II and scheduled for thoracolumbar spine surgery involving >3 vertebral levels. The patients were divided into two groups: group KD (ketodex) and group F (fentanyl). The primary objective was to compare the postoperative analgesic requirements among the groups. The secondary objectives included a comparison of the intraoperative anesthetic requirements, postoperative pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, side effects of the study drugs, and the duration of post-anesthesia care unit stay of both the groups. RESULTS: Ketodex use prolonged the mean time to first rescue analgesia (22.00±2.30 hours vs. 11.69±3.02 hours, p <0.001) and reduced the requirement of rescue analgesics in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to fentanyl use (70.00±8.16 µg vs. 113.31±36.65 µg, p =0.03). The intraoperative requirement of desflurane was comparable between the groups (p >0.05). The postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the group KD than in group F at most timepoints (p <0.05). Patients in group KD had a shorter post-anesthesia care unit stay than group F did (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose ketodex could be a safe substitute for fentanyl infusion when employed as an anesthetic adjuvant for patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgeries involving >3 vertebral levels to achieve prolonged analgesia without any opioidrelated side effects.

Sterile Silicone Studs-A Nonpharmacologic Modality for Prevention of Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Insertion: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Application of surgical skull pins causes hemodynamic fluctuations in neurosurgical procedures. To reduce this response, we describe the use of a novel nonpharmacologic method in the form of medical-grade sterile silicone studs to cushion the pressure of the skull pin in the adult population. This study aimed to evaluate the use of conventionally used fentanyl and medical-grade sterile silicone studs for the prevention of hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion. METHODS: A prospective randomized pilot study was conducted of 20 adult patients categorized as American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II scheduled for elective craniotomy in November 2022 in a tertiary-care hospital in Chandigarh, India. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: fentanyl only (FO group; n = 10) and medical-grade silicone studs (SS group; n = 10). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded at the following intervals: T1, baseline; T2, before induction; T3, after intubation; T4, before skull pin insertion; T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, and T10 at 0, 1, 3, 4, and 5 minutes after skull pin insertion. RESULTS: Demographic data (e.g., sex, age, disease pathology) were comparable between the groups. Although changes in heart rate between the 2 groups were comparable, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean arterial pressure from 1 minute to 5 minutes after pinning in patients with silicone studs compared with patients who received only fentanyl. CONCLUSIONS: The use of medical-grade silicone studs causes fewer hemodynamic fluctuations compared with fentanyl on skull pinning. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm the findings of this pilot study.

Hypoalbuminemia: incidence and its impact on acute respiratory distress syndrome and 28-day outcome in trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective observational study explored the effect of early onset hypoalbuminemia (EOH) on the development of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in orthopedic trauma victims. METHODS: Serum albumin levels were measured for the initial 7 days of injury for adult trauma patients (18-65 years). Patients were recruited into group A (any serum albumin value < 3.5 mg/dl) and group B (all serum albumin ≥ 3.5 mg/dl), based on serum albumin values. Patients were followed for the development of ARDS and outcome until 28 days. The primary outcome of the study was to explore the effects of EOH on ARDS. RESULTS: EOH (any serum albumin value < 3.5 g/dl within 7 days of injury) was present in 205/386 (53.1%) patients. The majority of 174/205 (84.9%) patients had EOH by the fourth day after the injury, with the mean time for development of EOH being 2.15 ± 1.87 days. ARDS manifested in 87/205 (42.4%) and 15/181 (8.3%) patients in group A and group B, respectively (p < 0.001). EOH had 8.2 times greater odds of ARDS (OD 8.2 95% CL 4.7-14.0, p = 0.000). The mean time for the onset of ARDS was 5.63 ± 2.62 days. No statistically significant causal relationship occurred between the onset of EOH and the development of ARDS (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.14, p = 0.16). At serum albumin cutoff concentrations of 3.4 gm/dl on D1 (AUC 0.68, 95% CI: 0.61-0.74, p = 0.000), ARDS may be anticipated in 62.8% of patients. The commencement of ARDS was independently correlated with EOH (p = 0.000), Respiratory rate on admission (p = 0.000), inotrope use (p = 0.000), and soft tissue injury (p = 0.000) (R2 = 0.466). The odds of 28-day all-cause death were 7.7 times higher in EOH (OD 7.7 95% CL 3.5-16.7, p = 0.00) and 9 times higher in ARDS (OD 9 95% CL 4.9-16.16, p = 0.00). CONCLUSION: EOH is a frequent occurrence and has a strong influence development of ARDS and 28-day mortality in trauma patients.

Prevention of pain on injection of propofol using ice gel pack versus pre-treatment with lignocaine: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Regardless of the positive attributes of propofol, it is frequently associated with pain on injection. We compared the efficacy of topical cold thermotherapy using an ice gel pack with intravenous lignocaine pre-treatment for reducing pain on propofol injection. METHODS: This single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in 200 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective/emergency surgery under general anesthesia. The patients were randomized into two groups: the Thermotherapy group- receiving an ice gel pack proximal to the intravenous cannula for 1 min, or the Lignocaine group-receiving 0.5 mg/kg of lignocaine administered intravenously, with occlusion proximal to the site of the intravenous cannula for 30 s. The primary objective was to compare the overall incidence of pain after propofol injection. The secondary objectives included the incidence of discomfort on the application of an ice gel pack, comparison of dose of propofol needed for induction, and hemodynamic changes at induction, between the two groups. RESULTS: Fourteen patients in the lignocaine group and 15 patients in the thermotherapy group reported pain. The incidence of pain and the distribution of pain scores were comparable among groups (p = 1.00). Patients of the lignocaine group required significantly less amount of propofol for induction as compared to the thermotherapy group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Topical thermotherapy using an ice gel pack was not found superior to lignocaine pre-treatment in alleviating pain on injection of propofol injection. However, topical cold therapy using an ice pack remains a non-pharmacological technique that is easily available, reproducible, and cost-effective. Further studies are required to prove its equivalence to lignocaine pre-treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI (CTRI/2021/04/032950).

Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography Through Distal Transradial Access: Early Experience with a Promising Access Route.

Background and Objective: Over the last few years, there has been considerable interest in the neurointervention community to use transradial approach for diagnostic and therapeutic neurointerventions. Distal radial approach has been postulated as an effective technique with reduced risk of hand ischemia. Our objective was to assess the safety and feasibility of distal transradial access (DTRA) to perform diagnostic cerebral angiography. Materials and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 25 patients who were taken for DTRA through the anatomical snuff box from December 2021 to March 2022 was done. Results: Twenty-five diagnostic cerebral angiographies were attempted with DTRA in 25 patients (age, 23-70 years; mean age, 45.4 years; 10 (40%) females). The right distal radial artery mean diameter was 2.09 mm. The procedure was successful in 21 (84%) procedures. Failure was seen in four cases, with three being converted to the proximal transradial approach without any need for redraping and one was converted to the transfemoral approach. The reason for access conversion was a severe spasm in three cases and dissection in one case. Selective catheterization of the cranial vessels through a distal transradial approach was achieved in 92 (96.8%) of 95 vessels. No significant access site complications were seen in the study cohort. Conclusion: DTRA is a promising approach for diagnostic cerebral angiography. Interventionists should get accustomed to this approach by overcoming the initial learning curve.

Anesthetic Concerns during Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery.

Background: Gamma-knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as one of the mainstream modalities in the treatment of many neurosurgical conditions. The indications for Gamma knife are ever-increasing and presently more than 1.2 million patients have been treated with Gamma knife worldwide. Objective: A neurosurgeon usually leads the team of radiation oncologists, medical physicists, nursing staff, and radiation technologists. Seldom, help from anesthetist colleagues is required in managing patients, who either require sedation or anesthesia. Methods: In this article, we try to elucidate anesthetic considerations in Gamma-knife treatment for different age groups. With the collective experience of authors involved in Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery of 2526 patients in 11 years with a frame-based technique, authors have tried to elucidate an effective and operational management strategy. Results: For pediatric patient (n = 76) population and mentally challenged adult patients (n = 12), GKRS merits special attention given its noninvasive nature but problems of frame fixation, imaging, and claustrophobia during radiation delivery become an issue. Even among adults, many patients have anxiety, fear, or claustrophobia, who require medications either to sedate or anesthetize during the procedure. Conclusion: A major goal in treatment would be a painless frame fixation, avoid inadvertent movement during dose delivery, and a fully wake, painless, and smooth course after frame removal. The role of anesthesia is to ensure patient immobilization during image acquisition and radiation delivery while ensuring an awake, neurologically accessible patient at the end of the radiosurgery.